Comparative remailer mix neworks, onion routing and pEp¶
This is not an exhautive comparative and might not be accurate.
It is base on the pages:
Remailer |
Mixnetwor ks |
Onion Routing |
pEp MixMailer |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type I/Cypherp unks |
Type II/Mixmas ter |
Type III/Mixmi nion |
Tor |
||
transport |
SMTP |
SMTP |
TLS + SMTP? |
TLS |
SMTP? |
nodes key |
NA |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes (OpenPGP) ? |
key rotation |
NA |
no |
yes |
yes |
active/pa sive |
nodes/key discovery |
manual |
pinger? |
directory |
dirauths |
GNS? |
types of nodes |
NA |
same? |
several? |
“G,M,E” |
same? |
packet format |
? |
? |
Sphinx |
specific |
? |
packet size |
different |
same? |
same |
same |
different in future? |
packet mixing |
NA |
yes |
yes |
no |
yes in future? |
cover traffic |
NA |
yes |
yes? |
no |
? |
directory server |
no |
no |
central |
decentral ized |
GNS/trust ed nodes? |
reply |
no |
no |
SURB |
“yes, circuit” |
NA |
spam |
yes |
yes |
yes |
NA |
? |
network diversity |
no |
no |
no |
yes |
? |
user friendly |
no |
no |
no |
yes |
? |
old crypto |
yes |
yes |
yes |
no |
? |